Illegal-Alien Burden on Taxpayers Dwarfs Cost of Deportation

By: - April 14, 2017

CNN targets removal price tag, ignores annual $113 billion impact of illegal population

By Margaret Menge, LifeZette:

 

CNN reported this week that the U.S. government spends more than $10,000 on average to deport each illegal alien, the implication being that taxpayers pay a heavy price for the removal of those in the country illegally.

But a group that advocates for enforcing immigration law says the cost of removal is a bargain.

“It costs a lot more to allow people to remain here,” says Ira Mehlman, a spokesman for the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR).

How much more? FAIR estimates that the burden placed on U.S. taxpayers by the roughly 13 million illegal immigrants residing in the country stands at roughly $113 billion a year.

The biggest cost-driver is education, according to a detailed 2010 analysis from the organization. It costs more than $50 billion each year to educate illegal immigrant children and the children of illegal immigrants, researchers found — with most paid through local property taxes and by states, with the federal government chipping in more than $1 billion for Title I programs.

Somewhat shockingly, the state of Iowa alone spends more than $300 million a year to educate English Language Learners, the vast majority of whom are children of illegal immigrants.

In Florida and Illinois, it’s almost $3 billion, according to a 2016 FAIR report, which looks only at education costs. In Texas, it’s $7.5 billion, and in California it’s $16 billion. Every year.

Medicaid for the children of illegal immigrants costs $1.6 billion a year, according to FAIR’s estimates, and U.S. taxpayers spend another $1.2 billion a year on Medicaid for childbirths: Medicaid pays because it is assumed that the children who are born will be U.S. citizens, under the “anchor-baby” policy.

But the $113 billion likely doesn’t even cover all the costs associated with illegal immigration.

It doesn’t cover the cost to U.S. taxpayers, for example, to prosecute crimes committed by illegal aliens.

“Some of these costs we don’t know, so we can’t report,” says Spencer Raley, a FAIR researcher who is working on an update to the 2010 report, to be released later this year.

It also doesn’t cover the loss to American businesses of remittances, the amount of money earned here by immigrants, many of them illegal, that is not spent here in our communities but rather sent back to families in Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, Haiti, etc. The World Bank reports that Mexico alone gets more than $25 billion a year in remittances from the U.S.

The researchers, furthermore, didn’t calculate the effect of illegal-immigrant workers in pushing down wages for Americans, or displacing them in some jobs.

Nor did the FAIR research include the effects of illegal-immigrant criminal gangs on the American economy, or local communities.

“That’s another thing that we would love to include in our cost studies, because I assume that would be billions more,” says Raley.

On deportations, FAIR is watching closely, but the organization isn’t sure what the Trump administration will do.

Matt O’Brien, director of research for FAIR and a former attorney with both Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Citizenship and Immigration Service (CIS), says “blatant statements” from President Donald Trump have led to a steep drop-off in border crossings, but that deportation of people already in the country is “more complicated.”

Part of the problem, he says, is that CIS is “staffed with a bunch of open-borders advocates.”

But the cost of deportations, says Mehlman, should not be an issue.

“For the 100 billion we’re now spending [per year], you could deport 10 million people, in theory,” he says.

But FAIR is not necessarily pushing for mass deportations, or expecting them.

“What we need to do is start removing the incentive for people to stay here,” says Mehlman. “The IRS doesn’t audit every tax return. You do enough of it, and everybody gets the message.”

He says the U.S. really needs to “ramp up enforcement against employers” and require every employer to use E-Verify.

“There’s no technological impediment,” he says, pointing out that credit-card companies process hundreds of millions of transactions a day, while guarding against fraud.

“The president has tried to use the authority that he has,” says Mehlman. “But Congress needs to get its act together and act legislatively.”

Read related content at Lifezette.

Trump to Democrats: Negotiate on Obamacare, or Else

HuffPo Publishes Column Calling for End to White Male Suffrage

  • RSS WND

    • Rural and Hispanic communities most helped by telehealth
      [Editor's note: This story originally was published by Real Clear Wire.] By Megan Bailey & Helder Toste Real Clear Wire Telehealth has become a health care gamechanger for tens of millions of Americans. We all know the time and effort an in-person health visit takes – travel to the appointment, time off work, hours spent… […]
    • Lawfare hasn't crippled Trump's lead over Biden
      [Editor's note: This story originally was published by Real Clear Wire.] By Philip Wegmann Real Clear Wire Donald Trump has been indicted in four separate criminal cases, tethered to the courtroom for the past month, and confronted by the embarrassing testimony of not just the former White House officials who worked for him but also… […]
    • A plan to root out anti-Semitism from America's campuses
      [Editor's note: This story originally was published by Real Clear Wire.] By Emilie Kao Real Clear Wire What would cause a professor to risk losing lifetime tenure? At UNC-Chapel Hill, professors are risking their jobs by threatening to withhold grades until the school ends the suspensions of anti-Israel student protestors. The professors’ actions reveal how… […]
    • Does men in women's bathrooms and showers violate national law?
      A new wrinkle has developed in a campaign across the United Kingdom to promote the transgender ideology: that men who simply say they are women should be given unlimited access to private facilities for women, from restrooms and changing rooms to showers. It seems that recommendation may violate the nation's Equality Act. The explanation of… […]
    • WATCH: 'Surreal': U.S. senator urges drug test before Trump-Biden debate
      Should there be a drug test before the presidential debates between Joe Biden and Donald Trump? U.S. Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., says "Why not?" The senator, whom Trump is considering as a potential running mate, was asked the question on Sunday about drug tests by Maria Bartiromo, and said: "I find it a little humorous,… […]
    • WATCH: 'They want to see proof of life': Bill Maher mocks Biden for Trump-debate proposal
      By Katelynn Richardson Daily Caller News Foundation Comedian and political commentator Bill Maher mocked President Joe Biden Friday over his agreement to debate former President Donald Trump, saying that viewers will be watching for “proof of life” in the current president. Trump and Biden agreed Wednesday to participate in two televised debates: June 27 on… […]
    • Government plans $1,000 fines for VICTIMS of gun crime!
      A county in Arizona is being sued over its plans to impose $1,000 fines on victims of crimes. That's right, the victims. These would be people who have a firearm stolen from them, and then they fail to report it fast enough to authorities. The Goldwater Institute, however, notes that state law in Arizona bans… […]
    • Forget 'Never Trumpers': More voters now say they'll never vote for Biden
      By Robert Schmad Daily Caller News Foundation President Joe Biden has a new problem cropping up in polling data: more Americans now dismiss even the possibility of voting for him. Among likely voters living in six key swing states, 51% say there’s “not really any chance” they’d vote for Biden, compared to just 46% saying… […]
    • For WND, it's 'Judea and Samaria' – not 'West Bank'
      Under the leadership of its founders Joseph and Elizabeth Farah, WND has committed to adhering to the "Biblical Heartland Resolution" passed recently by the National Religious Broadcasters convention, whereby participants pledge to use the terms "Judea and Samaria" when referring to the region in eastern central Israel, rather than the ubiquitous but misleading term "West… […]
    • Anti-Zionists occupy condemned university building, vandalize it with antisemitic graffiti
      (JERUSALEM WEEKLY) – Two blocks south of U.C. Berkeley’s campus, anti-Zionist protesters took over a vacant building owned by the university on Wednesday morning, vandalizing it with swastikas and antisemitic language. “Zionism is Nazism” was spray-painted in black letters on several walls inside the condemned building, which was destroyed in a 2022 fire. Several dozen… […]
  • Enter My WorldView