How to Ditch Netflix, Google, and Amazon for Reality

By: - April 2, 2024

Source link

Netflix has about 260 million subscribers around the world. Disney+ boasts 111.3 million subscribers, and Amazon Prime has millions of viewers to match. Across such platforms, Americans spend, on average, over three hours a day—or over 21 hours a week—streaming online content.

At the same time, over 60 percent of adults in America use digital voice assistants, such as Apple’s Siri, Google Assistant, or Amazon’s Alexa. Clearly, automated digital services have taken our modern culture by storm. The convenience, immediacy, and accessibility that all these digital services offer is unparalleled in history.

But have we stopped to consider whether this is a good thing? Do we actually want to live with these things? What are we trading in order to acquire such convenience? Perhaps our very humanity?

Consider life before streaming and digital subscriptions. We, as a society, had to exert effort and energy to acquire things like information, entertainment, or consumer products. All through history, we had no choice but to think through and question what we wanted and whether it was worth expending the energy to get it.

Even as recently as the early 2000s, we had to go to the video rental store, pay $5, and bring home a movie for the weekend—and then return it on Monday by 5 p.m., of course. How many of us would put in all that effort and energy to see a film we were only vaguely interested in, or worse, one we knew wouldn’t be good? Very few of us. But how often do we let Netflix keep playing the next episode of a series we don’t really care for?

This is how most automated digital services work. We pay a small fee to have constant, uninterrupted access from our own living rooms, kitchens, or bedrooms—or anywhere at all on our phones. It’s so easy. It’s so convenient. And it demolishes our standards of consumption. Rather than turn it off or do something better, isn’t it just easier to let the bad movie play in the background while you do something else “just to see how it turns out”?

We might not need to check our messages or socials, but it’s so easy to simply ask Alexa to do it that we go ahead and check them anyway. We don’t need to do more shopping, but Amazon no doubt has a good deal on something vaguely intriguing—and shipping is free, of course.

When access is so easy, we don’t have to assess whether the product is worth our time and energy or money. This is not just a slippery slope to blind consumerism; it also opens up the perfect avenue for promoting social and political agendas.

Political and social propaganda runs rampant across streaming services. Consider the sexual content, pointed monologue, or even product placement in the last show you watched. A huge majority of commercials, movies, TV series, and other content contains targeted suggestions and agendas to repeatedly inundate and inculcate consumers.

Psychologists and advertisers have long known that repetition is the key to desensitization and easier acceptance of new and, especially, controversial concepts. This is called the illusory truth effect. Suffice it to say that this scientific principle states that repeated information is more readily accepted as true than is new information.

Corporations—Amazon, Google, Disney, Netflix, and other Hollywood and tech companies—know this and are going all out to put it into practice via digital automation.

If consumers see one or two “diversity” ads, anti-family messages, or anti-Christian statements, they probably wouldn’t budge on their own values. But if they see these messages 20 times a day? For years? In their own homes? It becomes “normal” due to the high frequency of repetition and thus accepted as true, but it’s an illusory truth.

What is familiar becomes synonymous with what is true, even if we logically disagree. This is an especially effective strategy for use on young and developing minds. Do we want to invite this highly effective psychological programming into the sanctity of our homes via streaming and subscription services?

Consider what we trade for the convenience of automated digital access. We no longer control what pops up on our television, computer, or phone screens—that’s decided by the algorithms of the companies we subscribe to. AI chooses what we see in advertisements, TV series, and movies.

We are freely inviting anti-family and anti-traditional voices and messages into our daily lives, accessible at the click of a button. We give up the shield of protecting our children from these messages, and we sign away the chance to teach them how to use leisure time well.

The illusory truth effect will take root somehow in our homes and families simply because of constantly repeated mantras hidden in our daily consumed media. All for the sake of automated convenience.

That’s a price I am not willing to pay. As a result, my little family fully embraces putting in real effort to access entertainment, information, or consumer products. It forces us to reflect on what we are consuming and, more importantly, whether we should consume it. This is a very good thing! We reject digital automation because it and its messages do not align with our traditional values.

So, how should we go about re-evaluating our automated services? Here are some easy and effective ways:

  • Evaluate your subscriptions. What do we have coming in to our homes, and do we get enough use from them to offset the massive downsides? We all have differing jobs, needs, lifestyles, and families. Let’s scrutinize what we’re using to see whether these services are benefiting us or whether we’re just mindless consumers. (Don’t forget your email inboxes! There are tons of bots and spam lists out there with our email addresses, and we can “unsubscribe” or “mark as spam” any of these at any point.)
  • Hit “pause” on your existing subscriptions and streaming services. Most have a 7–30 day pause option, and we can use these as an experiment to see whether we truly need or benefit from these particular services. Try living without these things. You might be surprised at the freedom it brings.
  • Swap out digital services with analog (or alternative) options. Instead of Siri or Alexa or Google calendars, we can use paper planners, alarm clocks, or the good-old-fashioned kitchen timer. We can sign up for Bentkey instead of Netflix or own our favorite movies on DVD. We can go to the store instead of shopping on Amazon.
  • Delete whatever streaming, subscriptions, or digital assistants you can do without. We need to remember that these things are optional. As stated, let’s keep in mind our individual circumstances first. For instance, I have a blind cousin who relies on Alexa for reading aloud his text messages and other things. He obviously has a need for this service, but myself? I’m fine without it. (Remember, if we truly miss something, we can always resubscribe!)
  • Consider sharing the services you actually want with friends or family. Amazon Prime and Disney+, for example, rely on logging in with a particular user account. A few friends can share the same account, even if they don’t live together! This offers us streaming bonuses without everyone individually signing up. Piggybacking this way can help us think of streaming services as a “borrow and share” within our communities, rather than as a home necessity.

Now for the elephant in the room. If we delete these services, what are we supposed to do when we get bored? Here lies the real beauty in this: We can do anything we want. By not giving ourselves default media to consume, we open our time to be truly free time. We can really live exactly how we want to with this freedom from technology. Any of us can do it. Reject the growing norm of digital automation, and live life for real!

Image credit: Unsplash

  • RSS WND

    • 'Shut Up and Sing' still applies to emotional celebs
      When Laura Ingraham wrote her book "Shut Up and Sing" in 2003, the Left didn't read the book as much as overreact to the title. The title implied something important. While celebrities gain a "platform" they feel compelled to use, do their opinions reflect any expertise? Or is fame more important than logic? Celebrities often… […]
    • Iran says it could pursue nuclear weapons if Israel threatens atomic sites
      (ZEROHEDGE) – Iran's leadership has always strongly asserted that it is not pursuing the development of nuclear weapons, but instead has long sought a peaceful nuclear energy program. Various Ayatollahs over the decades have even declared the atomic bomb to be 'unIslamic' and against the teachings of the Koran. But that could change, Iran's military… […]
    • Ask not for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for EVs
      By H. Sterling Burnett Electric vehicles (EVs) have been all the rage among politicians since at least President Obama's first term in office, but they've never really caught on among the unwashed masses. Average folks with jobs, shopping to do, errands to run and kids to transport actually want their cars to deliver them to… […]
    • Google fires 28 employees involved in sit-in protest over $1.2 billion Israel contract
      (NEW YORK POST) – Google has fired 28 employees over their participation in a 10-hour sit-in at the search giant’s offices in New York and Sunnyvale, California, to protest the company’s business ties with the Israel government, The Post has learned. The pro-Palestinian staffers — who wore traditional Arab headscarves as they stormed and occupied… […]
    • Growing Latino support for border wall … and for Trump
      A new poll by Axios and Noticias Telemundo finds that 42% of Latino Americans support building a wall or fence along the entire U.S.-Mexico border. When pollsters asked the same question in December 2021, the number was 30%. That's a significant increase as the border crisis created by President Joe Biden's policies worsens. It's also… […]
    • College suspends professor 'energized' by Hamas attack on Israel
      (THE COLLEGE FIX) – A tenured professor is suspended throughout the rest of the semester after writing an essay celebrating Hamas’ attack on Israel. “McCarthyism is real. I’ve been relieved of teaching responsibilities,” Hobart and William Smith Colleges Professor Jodi Dean wrote Saturday on X. “Don’t stop talking about Palestine.” Get the hottest, most important… […]
    • O.J. Simpson is dead – Ron & Nicole are unavailable for comment
      As to the double murder case against O.J. Simpson, there was so much evidence that his guilt was obvious. This evidence included, but was not limited to, blood at the crime scene and on and in Simpson's white Bronco; a bloody glove found at the crime scene and a matching glove found at Simpson's home;… […]
    • How Greg Norman saved the Clinton presidency and other golf stories
      In their weekly podcast, Hollywood veteran Loy Edge and longtime WND columnist Jack Cashill skirt the everyday politics downstream and travel merrily upstream to the source of our extraordinary culture. The post How Greg Norman saved the Clinton presidency and other golf stories appeared first on WND.
    • The deadly price for Obama's ongoing foreign-policy legacy
      If a belligerent state launched 185 explosive drones, 36 cruise missiles and 110 surface-to-surface missiles from three fronts against civilian targets within the United States, would President Joe Biden call it a "win"? Would the president tell us that the best thing we can do now is show "restraint"? What if that same terror state's… […]
    • Growing movement hopes to disenfranchise small-state voters
      The structure of the American government was designed by the founders to prevent raw majoritarianism: the three branches of government and their checks and balances, the allocation of power between the state and federal governments, constitutional limits on the federal government's power, the differing composition of the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate,… […]
  • Enter My WorldView