OpsLens

John Brennan: Treason, Security Clearance, and National Security — PART 2

In our last article in this three-part series, we were talking about John Brennan and his reappearance in the “lame stream” media after President Trump pulled his security clearance. Now all we hear is how this is a national security or constitutional crisis. Folks, the bottom line is this: the President of the United States is the final arbiter on the granting of security clearances. Period. There is no constitutional guarantee to a security clearance and you serve at the discretion of the President or his designated representatives tasked with security clearance determinations. Which brings us back to John Brennan.

During his interview with Anderson Cooper, the former deputy director of the FBI began a long rambling diatribe that started with commentary on John McCain, but then turned to a very sinister solution to the Trump presidency. As reported by Breitbart:  Mudd’s solution appears to be encouraging various elements of the government, namely senators, members of the president’s cabinet, domestic law enforcement agencies, and intelligence agencies like the FBI and CIA, to begin a counter-operation against the administration’s policies. In essence, Mudd called for a political coup, which by its very definition is treason.

Yet this guy has the unmitigated gall to say that President Trump’s comment was treasonous? Talk about the height of hypocrisy.

Don’t forget, this is the same “lamestream media” that in the 1980s called President Reagan a “hardliner” and a “warmonger.” The same media that repeatedly demanded Reagan reach out to the then-Soviet Union regardless of their aggressive actions towards America. So, wait a minute, let me get this straight. President Trump is treasonous because he reached out to Russia, but Reagan was a traitor because he didn’t?

Which brings us back to John Brennan.

During this whole “slip of the tongue” fiasco invented by the mainstream media, former CIA Director John Brennan was the most outspoken critic of President Donald Trump. But to the point, John Brennan called for an armed insurrection against the President.

ZeroHedge reports: “In the most vocal opposition to President Donald Trump yet, former CIA Director John Brennan said that if the White House tries to fire special counsel Robert Mueller, government officials should refuse to follow the president’s orders, as they would be – in his view – ‘inconsistent’ with the duties of the executive branch.”

In his ZeroHedge article, Tyler Durden also reported the following statement made by Brennan: “I think it’s the obligation of some executive branch officials to refuse to carry that out. I would just hope that this is not going to be a partisan issue. That Republicans, Democrats are going to see that the future of this government is at stake and something needs to be done for the good of the future,” Brennan told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer at the Aspen Security Forum. Effectively, that is “calling for a coup against the president should Trump give the order to fire Mueller,” Durden wrote.

But here is the thing. Being a traitor is the only thing Brennan has been good at. In fact, I make the argument that Brennan has made his career by being a traitor, or at the very least, treasonable behavior.

In our next article in this series, we look at the facts of Brennan’s past and how there is clear and irrefutable evidence that this man should never been granted a security clearance to begin with. How he rose to the heights of power knowing what we know is the very definition of insanity. Stay tuned for the part 3.