OpsLens

John Brennan: Treason, Security Clearance, and National Security — PART 3

In our last article in the three-part series, we promised to examine the facts of Brennan’s past and how there is clear and irrefutable evidence that this man should never have been granted a security clearance to begin with. How he rose to the heights of power knowing what we know is the very definition of insanity. So let’s just look at the facts.

Brennan has gone on record and has openly admitted to voting for Gus Hall. Who is Gus Hall? Nobody important except that he was the four-time presidential candidate for the Communist Party of the USA back in the 1970s. So from the very beginning, Brennan was acting a traitor. He supported a Kremlin-backed political party and their operative, at the very height of the Cold War.

Now these actions may have been forgivable for some low-level government lackey, or perhaps even for someone who had seen the error of their ways and decided to reverse course. But that is not John Brennan.

Case in point: anyone in the United States Navy that even had ties to communist parties or who had relatives living in or from communist countries are subject to extra scrutiny and are, more often than not, banned from getting a Top-Secret clearance. I should know. During my time in the Navy, my father was still a Cuban national and it caused havoc for my security clearance.

So that begs the question: How in the hell did John Brennan become the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, and how in the world was he able to get, let alone maintain, a Top-Secret security clearance? Based on what I know, his voting for Gus Hall should have been a permanent disqualifier for any position within the national security infrastructure. But nope, he was appointed as the top official leading one of Americas premiere intelligence-gathering institutions.

But wait, there’s more.

There is now ample evidence that John Brennan broke the law. Why is this important? Because crimes of “moral turpitude” are immediate disqualifiers for a security clearance. As reported by the Canada Free Press, “There is now evidence that Brennan and others in the Obama administration used America’s taxpayer-funded national security apparatus to engage in espionage against an opposition party’s presidential campaign, an incoming administration, and that administration’s transition team. The whole campaign aimed at convincing Americans that President Trump was a tool of Russia was created by Democrats for their illicit purposes.”

So let’s dig a little deeper, just in case we need more evidence to show that President Trump had every right and ample reasoning to pull Brennan’s security clearance.

We all know that the Obama administration did little or nothing to combat radical Islam or jihadists domestically. In fact, does anyone else remember the directive that came from the administration to remove any mention of Islam and jihad from all law enforcement counter-terrorism training materials? I do, because I was intimately involved in counter-terrorism during that time. I served as Maritime Expeditionary Security Group One’s direct representative to the Commander of the Fifth Fleet for all matters on Anti-Terrorism and Force Protection.

Brennan assured multiple groups and law-enforcement agencies that the Obama administration’s “Countering Violent Extremism” program was effective…while also maintaining the delusion that the almost non-existent white-supremacist movement was just as large of a threat as Muslim extremists who were cutting off heads of journalists. Talk about asinine stupidity.

It was Brennan who forced the Obama administration’s ridiculous position on Islam and its radicals down our collective throats. Of course, he needed little to no convincing; it was Brennan who talked incessantly about “the goodness and beauty of Islam.” He repeatedly called Islam “a faith of peace and tolerance.”

Folks, what you need to know is that John Brennan was the CIA’s station chief in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Direct from the man’s own mouth: “I saw how our Saudi partners fulfilled their duty as custodians of the two holy mosques of Mecca and Medina,” he said. “I marveled at the majesty of the Hajj and the devotion of those who fulfilled their duty as Muslims by making that privilege — that pilgrimage.”

That position and those statements alone should have raised all kinds of questions during his security background check. When holding a Top-Secret security clearance you are subject to a single scope background investigation (SSBI) every five years. Which begs the next question: When was the last time his investigation was conducted?

But more to the point, former Marine John Guandolo, who worked in the FBI’s Counterterrorism Division, identified Brennan as an enemy operative who had converted to Islam.

It is clear from all the evidence that John Brennan is a clear and present danger to the President and to the National Security interests of the Untied States.

So someone please explain to me why President Trump shouldn’t have yanked his security clearance? Why is there any debate whatsoever?