Police Use of Force: Less Focus on Fear for One’s Life and More Focus on Policy

By: - October 4, 2018

My morning perusal of the day’s news briefs almost made me spit my coffee across the room when I read this news blurb from The Seattle Times Morning Brief : “Police and deadly force: Major changes are coming to the way King County handles police inquests. One of the big shifts that County Executive Dow Constantine will unveil today: less focus on whether officers feared for their lives, and more on whether they followed policies [emphasis mine].”

Is there no depth to which cop-hating, leftist politicians won’t sink?

I’ve written two articles opposing Washington State’s Initiative 940. If passed, police officers who use deadly force, even having acted in good faith and without malice, could still be prosecuted for homicide.

Well, Constantine is not waiting for a vote of the people to go after cops. Nope. He skipped right on by all that messy democratic process. Instead, like a feudal lord, he’s ordering the county, by fiat (executive order), to change how inquests judge law enforcement officers, following a deadly force incident—intended to make it easier to prosecute cops. Don’t be surprised if leftist jurisdictions across the country follow suit.

Here are some changes:

  • A sitting judge will no longer preside. Temporarily appointed administrators will now preside.
  • The county prosecutor will no longer present the evidence. Evidence will be presented by a “qualified specially selected outside attorney.”
  • Families of those killed by police can call their own witnesses (through their lawyer).
  • The family’s lawyer and “other parties” may give closing summary statements (no longer solely a fact-based hearing).
  • No more opening statements (which provide context). Constantine said opening statements “could cloud the proceedings…”
  • There is no longer a focus on an officer’s reasonable fear for his or her life. The new focus: “Did the use of deadly force fall within the department’s policies and the officer’s training?”

Obviously, if referred for homicide charges, the officer will still stand conventional trial. However, it is also obvious that County Executive Constantine wants to make it easier to charge and prosecute police officers who were forced to shoot a suspect because they feared for their lives. He believes anti-police groups, like Black Lives Matter, that promote the myth that police officers commit too many “unnecessary” shootings, despite FBI/DOJ statistics that prove otherwise.

Constantine doesn’t appreciate the reality that, though rare, a cop’s job sometimes includes shooting bad guys. His edict shows an obvious contempt for law enforcement and an apparent belief police officers are shooting people when they should not. This is what leftists do. They fabricate caricatures of thug, brute cops, then they insert the officers into a violent myth, where they are supposedly hunting people to shoot.

Oh, side note: If, at this point, you’re wondering if Dow Constantine is a despicable human being, the answer is yes… yes, he is (in my humble opinion). Believe me, this is not the only leftist guano this man is spreading all over the county he’s “serving.”

King County sheriff’s deputies and municipal police officers who work in cities within the county can now face prosecution if they shoot because they felt the suspect would have killed them if they didn’t. That’s not enough for the left. Not when they can so easily extrapolate the officer violated policy or training.

Have you read a policy manual from a law enforcement agency serving a leftist jurisdiction, lately? Well, you should. And, if you do, just try and imagine keeping in mind not only the sheer volume but also the leftist ideological content of the policies—while someone is pointing a gun at you.

Just look at an incident from earlier this year. A Seattle cop tackled an axe-wielding suspect, ending an incident with no one injured. The officer was clearly authorized to use deadly force in this incident but chose to risk his own safety to disarm the suspect without using lethal force.

Following the incident, the Office of Professional Accountability (OPA) accused the officer of violating department policy. They recommended discipline. Fortunately, as they say, cooler heads prevailed—thank you, police Chief Carmen Bestand the officer was not punished.

If a law enforcement agency’s civilian oversight will recommend discipline for an officer’s non-lethal action where no one got hurt, what will happen to cops who do use deadly force? Let’s say an officer fears for his or her life but protecting his or her life might violate department policy. In those cases, are cops supposed to allow suspects to kill them?

Only God could know what inconceivable circumstances could arise where an officer fears for his or her life but might have to violate policy or act in a way they weren’t specifically trained to do, to survive.

That’s right, isn’t it? How else could you interpret what this county executive is doing? The left won’t even entertain the notion that the reason so few police officers are prosecuted for “bad” shootings is because the vast majority of cops do the job properly.

If the inquest’s focus is now going to be on policy and training and not on an officer’s fear for his or her safety, what outcomes can we expect? People usually do things for a reason. In this case, if a person, Dow Constantine, makes it easier for cops to be prosecuted for uses of force, then logic tells us that person, Dow Constantine, doesn’t think enough officers are being prosecuted. Dow Constantine must want to send more cops to prison.

What does this mean? More cops will go to prison. How could that not happen when it is the left’s stated goal? The far left doesn’t like that most officer-involved shootings are legitimate, and most involve shooting armed suspects. But, even worse, more cops may hesitate when confronted by life or death situations. This means more cops will be seriously injured or killed.

Cops are no longer allowed to fear being killed by a suspect. Hold on…let me be fair: Cops may defend themselves if in fear for their lives but only if it doesn’t violate department policy.

How will cops digest this toxic gruel? More de-policing? How could it not lead to that?

Now it’s official—at least in King County. Law enforcement officers are no longer allowed to be human beings with rights to self-defense.

  • RSS WND

    • 'The great replacement'? Hell yes
      I recently gave a speech about open borders, why it's happening, who benefits and what's behind it – "the great replacement." My speech was delivered at a conservative conference put on by and attended by sheriffs from across the USA. My speech brought down the house and ended with a standing ovation. That's what happens… […]
    • Who is shaking the jar ... and killing America?
      The seventh book of C.S. Lewis' "The Chronicles of Narnia" is titled "The Last Battle" and depicts the end of the magical realm presided over by Aslan. As the remnant witnesses the destruction of their beloved land, one of the characters (Lord Digory) – who had witnessed the birth of Narnia – makes the remark:… […]
    • Biden campaigns on killing babies
      "Abortion," "women's reproductive health care," "freedom of choice," "my body my choice," "it's only a fetus" – all these nice little terms and sayings in reality represent the surreal, unnatural, against nature "right" for a mother to have her baby killed in her womb. Even the term "fetus" is a Latin work for "offspring," which… […]
    • Is climate change spurring child labor? No, but EV batteries are
      By Linnea Lueken Here we go again. Among the most annoying trends in media is one where a journalist will take any random topic, be it "trans sex workers" and their struggles in Indonesia, predatory loan practices, human trafficking – pick your poison, and connect it to climate change. My theory when it comes to… […]
    • Presidential contest turns into 'Saul vs. David'
      He's called the "Ragin' Cajun" for a reason. Watching Democratic strategist James Carville's recent expletive-filled rant, blasting "You little f–-ing 26-year-olds!" in response to recent polling showing Trump's healthy rise in support from young voters, I thought of King Saul's reaction to the future King David's mounting popularity, "an ugly mood" consuming Saul so that… […]
    • Confessions of a 'hate criminal'
      The remnant of Western civilization, which still values freedom of speech and other classical ethics and virtues, is aghast at Canada's Stalinesque "online harms bill," which would punish so-called "hate speech" with penalties up to life imprisonment, offers both cash incentives and legal anonymity for "whistleblowers" and would retroactively cover speech that occurred even decades… […]
    • It's simple: Let the Bill of Rights rule
      Years ago, a committee of lawyers from the Los Angeles County Bar Association gathered to discuss the issue of a "fair trial." Invited to the discussion were various leaders of the newspaper industry in Los Angeles County. The lawyers were in search of support of their idea to regulate the reporting on criminal defendants. The… […]
    • The deadly cost of lesbianism and feminism
      According to a major study by the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, "bisexual women die, on average, nearly 40 percent younger than heterosexual women, while lesbian women die 20 percent sooner." These are tragic numbers, numbers that should concern all of us, regardless of our attitudes towards lesbianism and bisexuality. If you care about people,… […]
    • Psalm 27: Encroaching End Times darkness
      Editor's note: The following video is presented by Pastor Daniel Joseph, president and founder of Corner Fringe Ministries. Subscribe to the Corner Fringe YouTube channel here. The post Psalm 27: Encroaching End Times darkness appeared first on WND.
    • Israel: Christians' past, present and future
      The name Jerusalem means "city of peace" or "habitation of peace." Yet ironically, more wars have been fought at the gates of Jerusalem than that of any other city on the face of the earth. For Christians, Jerusalem and Israel are part of our past, present and future. We're connected to Israel. And we're connected… […]
  • Enter My WorldView