Reports of British Challenges to Chinese Claims in the South China Sea

By: - September 13, 2018

International news media published coverage over the weekend of the British Navy warship HMS Albion conducting “freedom of navigation” operations (FONOPS) in the South China Sea. Albion sailed near the Paracel Islands, land claimed by China but not recognized by the international community as Chinese sovereignty. The Paracel Islands, along with nearby Spratly Islands, are claimed by numerous nations surrounding the South China Sea. The Paracel Islands are claimed by China, Vietnam, and Taiwan.

International Maritime Law

The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, the governing document signed in 1982, provides legal guidance on what should and should not be recognized as sovereign maritime space.

According to the law, “the sovereignty of a coastal State extends, beyond its land territory and internal waters and, in the case of an archipelagic State, its archipelagic waters, to an adjacent belt of sea, described as the territorial sea.”

So what exactly is the territorial sea and who can claim it? This is the issue at the heart of the drama unfolding in the South China Sea.

Territorial sea is defined as “up to a limit not exceeding 12 nautical miles, measured from baselines determined in accordance with this Convention.” This means that a nation can claim up to 12 miles from its coast as territorial waters. Foreign navies are allowed to navigate through territorial waters but must adhere to strict guidelines, defined as “innocent passage.”

Ships exercising their right of innocent passage must be “traversing that sea without entering internal waters or calling at a roadstead of port facility outside internal waters; or proceeding to or from internal waters or a call at such roadstead or port facility.” The passage must be “continuous and expeditious.”

Albion was en route to the Vietnamese port at Ho Chi Minh City, where she docked on September 3. China maintains that the passage through what they call territorial waters did not meet the requirements for innocent passage. “The relevant actions by the British ship violated Chinese law and relevant international law, and infringed on China’s sovereignty,” said the Chinese Foreign Ministry in a statement sent to Reuters. “China strongly opposes this and has lodged stern representations with the British side to express strong dissatisfaction.”

The British Navy spokesman was quoted by Reuters as saying “HMS Albion exercised her rights for freedom of navigation in full compliance with international law and norms.” Britain does not recognize the Paracel Islands as Chinese territory. This negates their claims of territorial waters, and the subsequent need to justify innocent passage. In the absence of territorial waters, the Albion was allowed to navigate freely near the Paracel Islands.

Other nations, including the United States, have conducted similar freedom of navigation operations in the South China Sea and were met with a similar response from China. One of the big issues is China’s action to build up islands in the region and using them to claim sovereignty. Under the United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea, territorial waters claims cannot be made over rocks or other uninhabitable geographic formations. China has been creating manmade islands, then claiming sovereignty of them and the 12 surrounding nautical miles, to exert control over the potential resources in the region.

In 2013, the Philippines brought a case against China to the Permanent Court of Arbitration, The Hague, in which the international court ruled that “China’s claims to historic rights, or other sovereign rights or jurisdiction, with respect to the maritime areas of the South China Sea encompassed by the relevant part of the ‘nine-dash line’ are contrary to the Convention and without lawful effect to the extent that they exceed the geographic and substantive limits of China’s maritime entitlements under the Convention.”

China neither recognized the proceedings nor the ruling and has maintained its sovereignty claims.

Isn’t This an Issue Between the UK and China?

This particular operation involved the British and Chinese navies but FONOPS in the region has long been the focus of the United States. This action by the British Navy comes after President Trump called on US allies to participate more in FONOPS in the South China Sea.

London-based publisher The Telegraph called Albion’s passage “a sign of Britain increasingly flexing its military muscle.” It can also be interpreted as a show of support for the United States’ very public position on China’s claims to islands in the South China Sea. To date, the United States has been the most active nation in disputing these claims through freedom of navigation operations.

Ian Storey of the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies in Singapore told Reuters that “The UK’s actions will please Washington as the Trump administration has grumbled that U.S. allies have been remiss in upholding freedom of navigation in the South China Sea.” He continued to add that “it might also nudge other U.S. allies to make similar moves.”

The United States and other nations have kept an eye to the claims made by China in the South China Sea for trade, resources, and military reasons.

The Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies estimated that over $3 trillion in trade passed through the South China Sea in 2016. Other estimates go as high as $5.3 trillion annually. Much of that trade passes through the Strait of Malacca, which connects the Pacific Ocean to the Indian Ocean. Claims by any nation on these areas could mean increased shipping costs and an impact on the international economy.

The region is also identified in World Factbooks as robust with “productive fishing and potential oil and gas reserves.” Each nation seeking to establish sovereignty hopes to gain access to the resource-rich waters in the South China Sea.

This move by the Brits clearly shows their position as a U.S. ally on sovereignty in the South China Sea. China is one of President Trump’s most pressing foreign policy issues. President Trump has made strong statements about trade with China and has imposed tariffs. As recently as this weekend, he threatened additional tariffs if China did not change its trade practices to be more friendly to American companies.

“We’re looking at $200 billion more, if you know that,” he told press aboard Air Force One of the tariffs imposed on China. “It’s in the hopper. We’ll see what happens.”

Neither the Office of the Prime Minister of Britain nor the Royal Navy have issued statements.

  • RSS WND

    • Mike Johnson: Victim of Stockholm Syndrome?
      By Paul Blanchfield In the congressional football game between the American Patriots and the Globalists, the AmPats had pulled the failed McCarthy and replaced him with new QB Mike Johnson on whom they now pinned their hopes for a safer America. They were gobsmacked when on the first snap from center, Johnson tucked the football… […]
    • Do anti-Semitic protesters still get student-debt 'forgiveness'?
      As to the signs held by and the slogans chanted by the "pro-Palestinian" protesters, switch out the words "Jew" or "Jewish" and insert the word "black." The nationwide George Floyd/Black Lives Matter protests of the summer of 2020 would then look like a knitting circle. President Joe Biden condemned "the anti-Semitic protests," but added, "I… […]
    • Another boneheaded move by House Republicans
      It was a bad day for First Amendment purists in the House of Representatives when, in bipartisan fashion, it voted to foist a definition of anti-Semitism by something called the "International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance" on the U.S. Department of Education, one of the Cabinet "deep state" posts marked for dropping by Donald Trump should he… […]
    • You want 'revolution,' kids? Brush up on your history
      The pro-Palestinian, pro-Hamas, anti-Israel protests have spread to university campuses across the country, just as the agitators hoped (and planned) for them to do. As was also expected, some of these protests have turned violent. A Jewish student was poked in the face with a flagpole at Yale University and hospitalized; another Jewish student was… […]
    • Can the public's distrust of media get much worse?
      The national media consider themselves essential in educating the electorate, so what happens when the electorate does not consider them a trustworthy guardian of democracy? The Associated Press and the American Press Institute just released a poll on the 2024 election and found only 14% of their sample expressed "a great deal of confidence in… […]
    • The 'Biden bump' didn't last long
      "The election is clearly changing now, moving towards Biden," the influential Democratic strategist Simon Rosenberg declared on March 26. "The Biden bump is real." For Republicans, Rosenberg is someone worth listening to; he was right about the nonexistent "red wave" many in the GOP expected back in 2022. When he said the election was moving,… […]
    • The C's wreak havoc on 'COEXIST' bumper stickers
      In their weekly podcast, Hollywood veteran Loy Edge and longtime WND columnist Jack Cashill skirt the everyday politics downstream and travel merrily upstream to the source of our extraordinary culture. The post The C's wreak havoc on 'COEXIST' bumper stickers appeared first on WND.
    • Taxpayers are subsidizing college radicalism
      Mohamed Abdou is a pro-Hamas "anarchist interdisciplinary activist-scholar of Indigenous, Black, critical race, and Islamic studies, as well as gender, sexuality, abolition, and decolonization" at Columbia University. Now, I don't mean to pick on Abdou. It's just that he happens to teach virtually every trendy pseudo-intellectual identitarian twaddle concocted by modern man. Ultimately, we make… […]
    • IRS: Worst creditor on the planet
      Dear Dave, My husband and I are following your plan, and we're on Baby Step 2. We just learned that the person who has done our taxes for the last three years made mistakes on all our returns. They were really nice and did our taxes for free, but now we owe back taxes in… […]
    • South Dakota puppy killer
      The post South Dakota puppy killer appeared first on WND.
  • Enter My WorldView