Rudy Giuliani Claims President Trump Could Have Shot Comey and Not Been Arrested

By: - June 4, 2018

Donald Trump’s lawyer, former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani, made some rather bombastic claims over the weekend, arguing that the President cannot be indicted while he’s in office. Giuliani went as far as to claim that the President could have shot former FBI director James Comey and still not be charged.

Giuliani offered some nuance to the claim, noting that Congress would immediately impeach the President, which would allow for charges to be brought forth. As Giuliani stated, “Impeach him, and then you can do whatever you want to do to him.”

Update: President Trump has echoed Giuliani’s statement, saying he has the “absolute” right to pardon himself.

These claims are disturbing. There is nothing in the Constitution that places the President above the low. Indeed, precedence suggests that the President can be detained. President Ulysses S. Grant was once detained for speeding after racing his horse and buggy through Georgetown, for example.

The Constitution does lay out a process for removing the President from office for breaking the law. This is the infamous impeachment process. However, impeachment concerns the removal from office. There is nothing in the Constitution that suggests that the President is above the law and can’t be charged. The two are separate issues.

President Trump does have the right to fire anyone serving underneath him. However, if the President were to fire someone in an effort to hinder investigations into legal matters, it may constitute a violation of the law. This would be because the seemingly legal act was carried out for an illegal purpose, namely obstruction of justice.

Giuliani’s comments come on the heels of a report by the New York Times, which revealed that the President’s legal team argued to James Comey that it is impossible for the President to interfere with an election. Specifically, the legal team argued: “It remains our position that the President’s actions here, by virtue of his position as the chief law enforcement officer, could neither constitutionally nor legally constitute obstruction because that would amount to him obstructing himself, and that he could, if he wished, terminate the inquiry, or even exercise his power to pardon if he so desired.”

Former FBI Director James Comey. (Credit: Facebook/Magaforamerica)

The letter to Comey also noted “the astounding public revelations about the corruption within the FBI and Department of Justice which appears to have led to the alleged Russia collusion investigation.”

More or less, Trump’s legal team is arguing that the investigation is politically motivated. There have been a few high profile leaks demonstrating that some of the investigators were politically compromised. Leaked texts between FBI lawyer Lisa Page and FBI agent Peter Strzok, both of whom were engaged in an intimate relationship, suggested that the two had a person vendetta against Trump. Lisa Page subsequently resigned, while Strzok was removed from the Trump investigation.

A lack of objectivity in any investigation is disturbing. The FBI was right to remove Strzok, and Page’s resignation was likely the right personal choice for the former FBI lawyer. Regardless, nothing has come forward to suggest that special counsel Robert Mueller himself is compromised. Mueller is a long-time Republican and has been noted for being a fair, objective investigator. That’s why he was chosen for the job.

My personal position remains unchanged: the Mueller investigation must go on. American democracy supersedes the Office of the President, no matter who is sitting in the Oval Office. If Trump is innocent of any crimes, the Mueller investigation will clear him and the President can move on with his administration. On the other hand, no person is above the law; if Trump is guilty of any crimes, he should be charged in the same way as any American.

 

  • RSS WND

    • Mike Johnson: Victim of Stockholm Syndrome?
      By Paul Blanchfield In the congressional football game between the American Patriots and the Globalists, the AmPats had pulled the failed McCarthy and replaced him with new QB Mike Johnson on whom they now pinned their hopes for a safer America. They were gobsmacked when on the first snap from center, Johnson tucked the football… […]
    • Do anti-Semitic protesters still get student-debt 'forgiveness'?
      As to the signs held by and the slogans chanted by the "pro-Palestinian" protesters, switch out the words "Jew" or "Jewish" and insert the word "black." The nationwide George Floyd/Black Lives Matter protests of the summer of 2020 would then look like a knitting circle. President Joe Biden condemned "the anti-Semitic protests," but added, "I… […]
    • Another boneheaded move by House Republicans
      It was a bad day for First Amendment purists in the House of Representatives when, in bipartisan fashion, it voted to foist a definition of anti-Semitism by something called the "International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance" on the U.S. Department of Education, one of the Cabinet "deep state" posts marked for dropping by Donald Trump should he… […]
    • You want 'revolution,' kids? Brush up on your history
      The pro-Palestinian, pro-Hamas, anti-Israel protests have spread to university campuses across the country, just as the agitators hoped (and planned) for them to do. As was also expected, some of these protests have turned violent. A Jewish student was poked in the face with a flagpole at Yale University and hospitalized; another Jewish student was… […]
    • Can the public's distrust of media get much worse?
      The national media consider themselves essential in educating the electorate, so what happens when the electorate does not consider them a trustworthy guardian of democracy? The Associated Press and the American Press Institute just released a poll on the 2024 election and found only 14% of their sample expressed "a great deal of confidence in… […]
    • The 'Biden bump' didn't last long
      "The election is clearly changing now, moving towards Biden," the influential Democratic strategist Simon Rosenberg declared on March 26. "The Biden bump is real." For Republicans, Rosenberg is someone worth listening to; he was right about the nonexistent "red wave" many in the GOP expected back in 2022. When he said the election was moving,… […]
    • The C's wreak havoc on 'COEXIST' bumper stickers
      In their weekly podcast, Hollywood veteran Loy Edge and longtime WND columnist Jack Cashill skirt the everyday politics downstream and travel merrily upstream to the source of our extraordinary culture. The post The C's wreak havoc on 'COEXIST' bumper stickers appeared first on WND.
    • Taxpayers are subsidizing college radicalism
      Mohamed Abdou is a pro-Hamas "anarchist interdisciplinary activist-scholar of Indigenous, Black, critical race, and Islamic studies, as well as gender, sexuality, abolition, and decolonization" at Columbia University. Now, I don't mean to pick on Abdou. It's just that he happens to teach virtually every trendy pseudo-intellectual identitarian twaddle concocted by modern man. Ultimately, we make… […]
    • IRS: Worst creditor on the planet
      Dear Dave, My husband and I are following your plan, and we're on Baby Step 2. We just learned that the person who has done our taxes for the last three years made mistakes on all our returns. They were really nice and did our taxes for free, but now we owe back taxes in… […]
    • South Dakota puppy killer
      The post South Dakota puppy killer appeared first on WND.
  • Enter My WorldView