Running for Sheriff in Rural West Texas

Tags:

By Jon Harris:

During this last election cycle, after lengthy discussions with many supporters and my wife, I decided to throw my hat in the ring and run for Sheriff in my county. This was my first foray into the political field, and to say the learning curve was steep would be an understatement. There was no curve at all; it was straight up.

My wife and I went to a myriad of training sessions. Ethics training, reporting requirements, filings, deadlines, and classes on building an organization were how we spent almost every weekend for months. We planned, we strategized, and we assembled our support base. My race, although in a very rural west Texas county, became a national oddity. Reporters from several prominent publications became interested in the political fight that was happening. News media, the Justice Department, several civil rights groups and more were all spending resources to follow a race in this little corner of rural Texas. It was quite surprising.

I have always believed that there is no place for politics in law enforcement. Regrettably, our system makes the Sheriff race a partisan contest. To me, this is a real shame. The party politics takes away from the issues, the qualifications of the candidates, and the process. Due to staunch partisanship, the truth of what matters is often lost in political rhetoric. Because I had not been in the county for very long, it became evident that I would not have time to run against the sitting Sheriff in the primaries. This pushed me to run in the opposing party so my race would be in the general election, which was a very hard decision for me.

What I didn’t realize was that I would be a party of one. There was no party organization in the county at all. The Sheriff I was running against had repeatedly put the party chair in jail for one thing or another. It was evident to me the Sheriff was using the office as a political hammer, and I wanted nothing to do with that type of party politics, so I ran on the opposing ticket.

I was very idealistic. I had eighteen months to campaign and gain support. I expected rules and decorum to be followed. With a career in the Military and Law Enforcement, you learn to do the job, not to be political. Unfortunately, my opponent did not feel the same way. The race degenerated into the dirtiest thing I had ever seen. My wife and I, during the course of the campaign, pledged not to go to the dark side. We promised the voters and ourselves not to get into the gutter but to concentrate on what was important, the issues and what I thought I could do as Sheriff to improve law enforcement in the county. It is the tactic and approach I stayed with throughout.

Sadly, I was not successful. Although the negative attacks, and the absurd things that were hurled at me were not effective for the most part, it really didn’t matter in the long run. They say you can’t prove a negative– that was never a truer statement than when it comes to a political race where everything imaginable is thrown at the wall to see what will stick. Those attacks still hurt my family and me personally.

The two campaigns, mine, and my opponent’s, were diametrically opposed as to how we approached the task. The race became party-based. In the end, the race was very close and decided by 124 votes. Although I did have a good number of crossover votes between the parties, there simply were not enough to overcome the largest voter turnout in history for my county. The political contest was driven by the national election.

What was the most disappointing and enlightening at the same time was how partisan the sides were. It really made no difference what the issue was, or what the news or the information was. The entire race depended on whether the letter in front of your name was D or R. That’s what the race was about. This made no sense at all to me. The Sheriff does not vote on laws or bills. The Sheriff does not present bills in Congress or at the state level. The Sheriff has no political vote at all, and that is the way it should be.

The voters saw it completely different. My race for Sheriff was ultimately tied to the national politics of the presidential election. I started getting questions about my stand on national policies, health care, abortion rights, immigration, and all the rest. None of those positions, regardless of what they were, would have had any effect on my job as Sheriff. I found this to be utterly moronic.

Something else I discovered while running was who was genuine and who was not. This little tidbit of information has real value. It lets you know exactly who to trust and who not to turn your back on. It was very depressing to see people that you thought were and had been your friends, spread the lies and party line of your opponent. My intention was not to run as the Republican Sheriff or the Democratic Sheriff but as the County Sheriff. It seems I was very naive in thinking the voters actually cared about issues or took the time to educate themselves.

Now, after the election, I have had a chance to reflect on the trials and tribulations of the last two years. It was an education in people, motivations, and exactly how things work. Something that I have also learned is that small town politics are no better — and maybe even worse — than the national political discourse. I tried to run as much of a nonpartisan race as I could. While I do get compliments on how I stayed on the higher ground, it was realistically to no avail. I feel a little like Don Quixote fighting windmills in that regard.

On the national scene, we saw much of the same thing. It is no longer issues and real policies that drive voters. It has become win-at-any-cost for the politicians and a strictly party-driven exercise for most voters. The voters that follow this track no longer think for themselves. In my opinion, that is a real shame.

I have also learned why it is so hard to find good people to run for office. Why would anyone in their right mind voluntarily subject themselves and their family to what a run for political office has become today? I subjected myself to the vitriol that was thrown my way naively, not really understanding how bad it would end up becoming. I have very strong reservations about stepping into that arena again.

Putting my race aside, on the national front, I have been waiting for years for a President not to be party-driven. We deserve better than what we have had in the past. We deserve a leader that sees everyone as the same. Reagan was close. He saw things clearly, I think. I have been waiting for a President to give their acceptance speech and say they are no longer a Republican or a Democrat but only an American. They are the American President, and party politics no longer matters. Listening to the acceptance speech for President Donald Trump, I heard that message just about as close as I have ever heard it. With the new President, I am feeling a little better. I think there will be an abandonment of strictly party politics, at least as far as the President is concerned.

During his inauguration speech, I heard President Trump say, “What truly matters is not which party controls our government, but whether our government is controlled by the people.” I have been waiting for a statement like that from a President my entire adult life.

My faith in the political system, as well as in people in general, was severely shaken by the experience of my little county-wide race. Even though I saw the worst part of politics from a very up front and personal side, I am still idealistic, still hopeful. As we watch our two parties still warring over a contest that has already been decided, it seems things just will not change.

But I am hoping President Trump can rise above, or at least ignore the partisanship, and restore my faith in the political system once more.

Jon Harris is an OpsLens contributor and former Army NCO, civilian law enforcement officer, and defense contractor with over 30 years in the law enforcement community. He holds a B.S. in Government and Politics and an M.S. in Criminal Justice.

To contact or book OpsLens contributors on your program or utilize our staff for your story, contact [email protected].

  • RSS WND

    • New data highlights Achilles' heel of 1 of Biden's favorite green power sources
      Nick Pope Daily Caller News Foundation New government data shows that wind power generation fell in 2023 despite the addition of new capacity, a fact that energy sector experts told the Daily Caller News Foundation demonstrates its inherent flaw. Wind generation fell by about 2.1% in 2023 relative to 2022 generation, despite the 6 gigawatts… […]
    • 'The great replacement'? Hell yes
      I recently gave a speech about open borders, why it's happening, who benefits and what's behind it – "the great replacement." My speech was delivered at a conservative conference put on by and attended by sheriffs from across the USA. My speech brought down the house and ended with a standing ovation. That's what happens… […]
    • Who is shaking the jar ... and killing America?
      The seventh book of C.S. Lewis' "The Chronicles of Narnia" is titled "The Last Battle" and depicts the end of the magical realm presided over by Aslan. As the remnant witnesses the destruction of their beloved land, one of the characters (Lord Digory) – who had witnessed the birth of Narnia – makes the remark:… […]
    • Biden campaigns on killing babies
      "Abortion," "women's reproductive health care," "freedom of choice," "my body my choice," "it's only a fetus" – all these nice little terms and sayings in reality represent the surreal, unnatural, against nature "right" for a mother to have her baby killed in her womb. Even the term "fetus" is a Latin work for "offspring," which… […]
    • Is climate change spurring child labor? No, but EV batteries are
      By Linnea Lueken Here we go again. Among the most annoying trends in media is one where a journalist will take any random topic, be it "trans sex workers" and their struggles in Indonesia, predatory loan practices, human trafficking – pick your poison, and connect it to climate change. My theory when it comes to… […]
    • Presidential contest turns into 'Saul vs. David'
      He's called the "Ragin' Cajun" for a reason. Watching Democratic strategist James Carville's recent expletive-filled rant, blasting "You little f–-ing 26-year-olds!" in response to recent polling showing Trump's healthy rise in support from young voters, I thought of King Saul's reaction to the future King David's mounting popularity, "an ugly mood" consuming Saul so that… […]
    • Confessions of a 'hate criminal'
      The remnant of Western civilization, which still values freedom of speech and other classical ethics and virtues, is aghast at Canada's Stalinesque "online harms bill," which would punish so-called "hate speech" with penalties up to life imprisonment, offers both cash incentives and legal anonymity for "whistleblowers" and would retroactively cover speech that occurred even decades… […]
    • It's simple: Let the Bill of Rights rule
      Years ago, a committee of lawyers from the Los Angeles County Bar Association gathered to discuss the issue of a "fair trial." Invited to the discussion were various leaders of the newspaper industry in Los Angeles County. The lawyers were in search of support of their idea to regulate the reporting on criminal defendants. The… […]
    • The deadly cost of lesbianism and feminism
      According to a major study by the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, "bisexual women die, on average, nearly 40 percent younger than heterosexual women, while lesbian women die 20 percent sooner." These are tragic numbers, numbers that should concern all of us, regardless of our attitudes towards lesbianism and bisexuality. If you care about people,… […]
    • Psalm 27: Encroaching End Times darkness
      Editor's note: The following video is presented by Pastor Daniel Joseph, president and founder of Corner Fringe Ministries. Subscribe to the Corner Fringe YouTube channel here. The post Psalm 27: Encroaching End Times darkness appeared first on WND.
  • Enter My WorldView