Brief history lesson. Back on January 1st and 2nd of 1942, representatives from 26 Allied countries signed a declaration to fight the Rome-Berlin-Tokyo Axis enemy governments together rather than seek separate peace treaties. At that time, United States President Franklin D. Roosevelt coined the term “United Nations,” and thus the United Nations as we know it today was born.
Three and a half years later, on October 24, 1945, the United Nations was ratified by a charter and became an official international peace-keeping organization with 51 original member states. And that, my friends, is about where the good news ends.
The United Nations of today is nothing like the austere body that was formed so many years ago. The UN of today, in this writer’s humble opinion, is the driving force behind the globalist agenda and “New World Order,” using excessive and some would argue brutal force (and tactics) to bully weaker countries into submission.
So when President Donald Trump says he wants to defund the United Nations he is absolutely correct; we should. But not for the reasons you may think. The real reason? It is a proven fact that United Nations “peacekeepers,” which are nothing more than armed “thugs,” have committed heinous and atrocious sexual crimes on an epic scale. But more importantly, the United Nations is covering up for these professional rapists.
The proof? UN Security Council “Update Report No. 3: Sexual Exploitation and Abuse by UN Peacekeeping Personnel.” In this report you will see that the United Nations knew about these criminal activities for decades and did nothing.
And I quote: “Reports of sexual exploitation and abuse by UN personnel of vulnerable people—often the very people that these UN workers were supposed to protect—have been surfacing for years [emphasis added]. Particularly persistent and serious allegations of abuse by humanitarian workers of refugees in West Africa led the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) to commission a consultants’ report in 2001 on the matter.”
What prompted the investigation was a request by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) to the Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS) to look into “allegations of sexual exploitation of female refugees by international and national aid workers, specifically regarding United Nations and non-governmental organization (NGO) staff and peacekeepers in three West African countries: Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone.” Now, mind you, the original request occurred in November of 2001.
The 2001 report then prompted a UN General Assembly report dated October 11, 2002: “Investigations into sexual exploitation of refugees by aid workers in West Africa.” It seems as if all the UN is capable of doing is writing reports.
If you read the 2001 report closely you will see that the UN came to a three-part conclusion.
- Agencies who employ sexual exploiters and abusers acknowledge responsibility for “a betrayal of trust as well as a catastrophic failure of protection”—but the good news is that there is a “real commitment on the part of agencies to address this problem and take responsibility for implementing necessary management changes.”
Let me put that into plain English. We know that sexual abuses are happening. We failed “catastrophically.” Their words, not mine. They acknowledge the betrayal of trust against the very people they are supposed to be there to protect.
Now what kills me is the next part: the good news is that there is a real commitment on the part of agencies to address this problem and take responsibility for implementing necessary management changes. Really? Because it’s now 2018 and nothing has changed. But more on that later.
- The report and its Plan of Action were achieved despite “different views and perspectives on some issues” (remember, the topic is sexual abuse, exploitation, and murder of war-torn populations by their military guards) and “humanitarian agencies must be more accessible and better able to listen and make themselves accountable to those they wish to assist. Without the development of real and effective frameworks for accountability, little progress can be made in this area.”
In English: many United Nations members believe there is no problem and there is nothing wrong with raping children or murder. But due to outside pressure they reluctantly agree to set up an accountability system. Really? Because it’s 2018 and nothing has been done. Again, more on that later.
- The Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) is the main mechanism for inter-agency coordination of humanitarian assistance, a unique forum involving the key UN and non-UN humanitarian partners. The 2002 report’s final conclusion is that: “The Task Force acknowledges the way in which IASC has responded to this issue [i.e., sexual abuse, exploitation, and murder of war-torn populations by their military guards]…It has accepted a policy statement with serious implications in terms of staffing and management responsibilities and their relationship with beneficiaries. It hopes that IASC will demonstrate the same spirit on receiving this report and Plan of Action and that it will provide the leadership required to ensure its effective implementation.”
Did you read that carefully? “We hope that IASC will demonstrate the same spirit.” You hope? We are talking about pedophiles, child rapists, and worse. And all you can offer is “hope”?
It doesn’t take rocket science to figure out pretty quickly that the UN is horrible at policing its own. They are placing their trust in “hope and change.” Sound familiar?
Let’s fast forward now to 2004. According to the Weekly Standard, in December of 2004 a classified UN report documented the sexual abuse and exploitation of war refugees in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The charges were vile and of the worst depravity: “The worst of the 150 or so allegations of misconduct—some of them captured on videotape—include pedophilia, rape, and prostitution.”
While the UN was investigating the Congo scandal, two “peacekeepers” in the neighboring country of Burundi were suspended on similar charges.
Fast forward to 2011. The New American reported that “several Uruguayan troops serving under the UN in Haiti held down and gang-raped a teenage boy.”
Fast forward to 2015. The New American ran another article proving that, after four years, nothing had changed: “Hundreds of Haitian women and children were raped and sexually abused by predators in the United Nations ‘peace’ military, according to a draft UN report obtained by the Associated Press.”
In that very same article, it was also reported that just months before, “UN Troops in Mali slaughtered unarmed civilian protesters and UN Forces in the Central Africa Republic were exposed systematically raping children as young as nine years old.”
Fast forward to February of 2018. The Free Thought Project published an article where the title says it all: “Report Finds UN Employees 3,300 Pedophiles Responsible for 60,000 Rapes in Last 10 Years.”
In short, the article recounts a horrific story as told by a former high-level official from within the UN who has blown the whistle on a pedophilia network of massive proportions involving thousands of UN employees wreaking havoc on tens of thousands of innocent children.
Keep in mind that the number of rapes reported represent only a small fraction of the total number of atrocities being committed by UN representatives. This is happening on a daily basis. It is not unreasonable to expect that a large number of victims never come forward due to ignorance of the process of reporting or out of fear. After all, who is policing the police?
Raping children is one activity that is universally agreed upon to be so morally repugnant and so outrageous as to warrant immediate and drastic action. Yet it has been 17 years and the UN has done nothing.
Despotic UN member countries openly admit that their soldiers are raping tens of thousands of innocent victims. Does the United States have a moral, ethical, if not legal obligation to address this atrocity? Expel these rogue nations?
Didn’t we just bomb Syria for chemical weapons use, and our justification was moral outrage and the convention of nations against the use of chemical weapons? Then why is the rape of children no less morally outrageous?
Is it not high time that we revisit the purpose and role of the United Nations?
Mr. Trump is right. Defund the United Nations now. End the atrocities. Then and only then will the United States come back to the negotiation table for UN funding.
