OpsLens

Supreme Court justice says the quiet part out loud, wants ‘crazy’ majority rulings reversed * WorldNetDaily * by Bob Unruh

Source link

U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C.

U.S. Supreme Court justices are supposed to issue their decisions based on the Constitution, and not politics.

But that’s not to say politicians never influence the court, or at least try to.

Remember when Sen. Chuck Schumer threatened two justices, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, while they were considering an case?.

He warned them, “I want to tell you, Gorsuch, I want to tell you, Kavanaugh: You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.”

That was under a majority of relatively conservative, and not “progressive” or “woke” justices.

That ratio remains the same, but now, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, feeling the power that her Democrat party is heading toward with coming majorities in Congress, is demanding that her opinion, the minority opinion, be made the law.

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor
Sonia Sotomayor

According to a commentary from constitutional expert Jonathan Turley, she cited the “outpouring” of votes during the midterms, and said she now wants some rulings with which she disagreed changed.

Her colleagues, she said, did some “crazy” things, which of course she would have directed to a different result given her way.

“There have been some systemic changes in my court’s jurisprudence in many areas of law. We’ll settle down, too. Not quite sure when. But we will. And a new order will be established that people will begin to understand.”

Her “new order” apparently, means minority control to her.

She was speaking specifically about a presidential immunity decision in Trump v. United States, which attributes to presidents at least presumptive immunity for their official acts.

At the time the ruling was released, she complained that it made President Donald Trump a “king above the law.”

Actually, it provided guidelines for a president to fight the lawfare schemes assembled by his political opponents, which was happening at the time.

She said immunity is not the only minority opinion she wants to have enforced.

“I dissent a lot. I’m hoping that the court will take back some of the crazy things that it’s done. I’m only joking — maybe not…No, seriously, You know, I’ve spoken openly about this, there’s some opinions that I hope in my lifetime will get overturned. The immunity case is one of them,” she complained.

The Hill reported she complained about the bias against wokeness she perceives, confirming it will take “some hard work” for the country to return to an “even keel.”

That immunity ruling actually gave a president no immunity for unofficial acts, but that clearly is not a sufficient weapon for Sotomayor’s desired lawfare against a president.

She was appointed to Barack Obama, whose time in office was intended to “fundamentally change” the country.

Bob Unruh

Bob Unruh joined WND in 2006 after nearly three decades with the Associated Press, as well as several Upper Midwest newspapers, where he covered everything from legislative battles and sports to tornadoes and homicidal survivalists. He is currently a news editor for the WND News Center, and also a photographer whose scenic work has been used commercially. Read more of Bob Unruh’s articles here.