By Daniel Chaitin, Washington Examiner:
Judge James Robart of Washington state, whose ruling in February froze President Trump’s first travel ban, decided Thursday that the president’s revised travel ban is not subject to the prior injunction enforced against the first one.
This happened after a federal judge in Hawaii, followed by another in Maryland, put the revised travel ban on hold hours before it was set to take effect.
Plaintiffs in the case had argued that tenets of the president’s new executive order, specifically that the 90-day suspension of to travel from six majority-Muslim countries and a 120-day freeze on refugees entering the U.S., were nearly identical to that of the first order.
To read the rest of the article visit Washington Examiner.