OpsLens

U.S. Lawmaker Backs Sending Abrams Tanks To Ukraine To Break Deadlock With Germany And ‘Unleash’ Leopards

Source link

Germany faced more criticism from European countries on January 22 over its opposition to sending Leopard tanks to Ukraine unless the United States also sent M1 Abrams tanks, but a top U.S. lawmaker said he supports sending even a symbolic number of M1 Abrams battle tanks to break the deadlock.

Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki lashed out at Germany over its refusal to agree to allow NATO members to send the German-manufactured tanks unless the United States sent its Abrams battle tanks.

“Germany’s attitude is unacceptable. It has been almost a year since the war began. Innocent people are dying every day,” told the PAP agency.

Live Briefing: Russia’s Invasion Of Ukraine

RFE/RL’s Live Briefing gives you all of the latest developments on Russia’s ongoing invasion, Kyiv’s counteroffensive, Western military aid, global reaction, and the plight of civilians. For all of RFE/RL’s coverage of the war, click here.

The Baltic states of Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania made a joint call to Germany on January 21 urging it to step up its leadership and send its main battle tanks to Ukraine, and British Foreign Minister James Cleverly said Britain wants an international deal to provide Ukraine with the German-made tanks.

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, asked at a news conference in Paris about providing tanks, said all weapons deliveries to Ukraine so far had taken place in close coordination with Western partners. “We will do that in the future,” he said.

With pressure continuing to mount on Germany, U.S. Representative Michael McCaul (Republican-Texas), said that the United States should send its tanks to Ukraine to break the stalemate over sending the Leopards.

“Germany will not put one tank in…until we give them reassurances we are going to put our Abrams in,” McCaul told CNN. “If we did that publicly, that would unleash so many leopard tanks because there are 10 other nations that are looking for Germany to sign off on the tanks that they have given them.”

Mark Cancian, a military analyst at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, agreed that the United States could donate a small number of M1 Abrams to unlock Germany’s approval for Leopards.

Under such a situation, Ukraine could potentially receive 100 to 150 Leopards from NATO allies over several months, he said, noting the number of Leopards produced was about 2,000.

Cancian told RFE/RL that the number of tank deliveries to Ukraine currently being discussed — 14 from the British and 15 from Poland — isn’t enough to have an important impact.

“Scale is important,” he said. “I think at 100, 150 [units], it starts having an important battlefield impact. It’s not going to be a game changer, but you’ll notice that their armed forces are more effective.”

McCaul, who is chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said Russia’s decision to appoint General Valery Gerasimov to take charge of the Ukraine campaign means that Russia is “going to start a major offensive on the eastern flank in the Donbas” and tanks can help stop that.

McCaul stressed that the United States would not have to send very many Abrams tanks.

“All we have to do is unleash what Germany has and the 10 other countries in NATO have. NATO has to share the burden. NATO countries are sharing the burden,” he said.

He added that an agreement to send them also would mean the release of additional tactical missiles that can reach Crimea and “take out the Iranian drones.”

Asked whether providing Ukraine with battle tanks could cause an escalation in the war, McCaul brushed away concerns, saying the United States and other Ukrainian allies had heard Russian warnings before.

The head of Russia’s State Duma earlier on January 22 said that the promised deliveries of additional weapons to Kyiv could heighten the war in Ukraine to a new level that could result in a “global catastrophe.”

Vyacheslav Volodin wrote on Telegram that “if Washington and NATO countries supply weapons that will be used to strike civilian cities and attempt to seize our territories…this will lead to retaliatory measures using more powerful weapons.”

The comments by the head of Russia’s lower house of parliament were broadly taken to mean nuclear weapons, and he has now joined other high-ranking Russian officials who have recently threatened a significant escalation of the unprovoked war the Kremlin launched against Ukraine 11 months ago.

The latest package of military equipment announced by the Ukraine Defense Contact Group includes air-defense systems, Humvees, ammunition for artillery, and missiles for the High Mobility Advanced Rocket Systems (HIMARs).

The package is sufficient for Kyiv’s forces to make progress defending Ukrainian territory and take back territory occupied by Russia, Pentagon spokesman U.S. Brigadier General Patrick Ryder said after it was announced during a meeting of the Ukraine Defense Contact Group.

McCaul said there was enough support from both Republicans and Democrats in Congress to continue approving such military aid, and Cancian said this is “the most important” thing for Ukraine along with the backing of NATO allies.

“Looking long term, that’s much more important than any particular item in the aid package. [Ukraine] cannot survive or win if the amount of aid goes down substantially or dries up.”

He also dismissed the idea that Leopard deliveries would cross some line for Moscow.

“This idea that Leopards are the thing that is just going to break the camel’s back — no, they’re not escalatory,” he said.

With reporting by CNN