We here at WorldNetDaily need your help. For nearly 30 years, WND has delivered independent investigative reporting that others won’t touch. Watching, subscribing and commenting on Rumble is one of the most important ways you can help us continue that work and expand its reach. It only takes a moment, but it makes a real difference in keeping this reporting visible and strong. Thank you!
Could the United States legally stop Muslim immigration?
It sounds like a constitutional impossibility. Attorney Will Chamberlain says it may not be.
In this provocative conversation, Elizabeth Farah asks how much power America actually has to decide who is allowed through its gates. Chamberlain argues that foreign nationals seeking entry do not possess the same constitutional protections as American citizens, giving the federal government extraordinarily broad immigration authority.
Farah puts the hardest question directly on the table: Could America ban Muslim immigration outright?
Chamberlain calls that the “most maximalist position” available, but says he believes it could be legally possible. He goes further, arguing that U.S. policy should seek “net negative Muslim migration,” with fewer Muslims entering the country than leaving it.
But there’s a constitutional catch: once people are protected by the Constitution, America’s sweeping guarantees of religion, speech and association sharply limit what government can do. As Chamberlain puts it: “Once they’re here, they’re here.”
Farah and Chamberlain tackle the questions that follow: Could immigrants be screened for ideology and religious beliefs? What about social-media histories, student visas, H-1B workers, foreign imams and family sponsorship? Could Islam itself ever be treated legally as a political ideology rather than solely a religion?
The discussion ultimately comes down to one dividing line: the border.
Chamberlain argues that stopping unwanted immigration before entry is far easier legally than confronting it afterward, and calls for scholars to develop new constitutional arguments for a far more aggressive immigration policy.
How far can America legally go before the courts say no?
Join the discussion on X:
Can America simply shut the door on Muslim immigration? Will Chamberlain says the Constitution may leave far more room than you’ve been told. WATCH @willchamberlain https://t.co/egxvWlQOoi
— Elizabeth Farah 🇺🇸 America 1st always 🇮🇱 (@ElizabethFarah) September 29, 2026
Here are the links to watch the Elizabeth Farah Show interviews on various platforms:
Elizabeth Farah on YouTube
Elizabeth Farah on X
WND on X
Elizabeth Farah on Rumble
