1
Every morning, millions of people unknowingly run a biological experiment on themselves.
They apply lotions, serums, deodorants, fragrances, and active products—assuming those substances stay politely on the surface of the skin. They don’t. Some cross the barrier. Some interact with receptors. Some influence inflammation, immune signaling, and even neural pathways.
Your skin is not a wall.
It’s a data port.
It is innervated, immunologically active, chemically permeable, and neurologically connected. It constantly communicates with the brain and the rest of the body, sending and receiving signals that influence mood, pain, stress, and homeostasis (Elias, 2005; Slominski et al., 2013).
If biohacking is about optimizing inputs, then skincare may be one of the most overlooked inputs of all.
When Skin Becomes the Canary
My understanding of topical absorption didn’t begin in a lab. It began with my nervous system.
I grew up with severe eczema, chronic hives, asthma, and relentless itching that left my skin bruised and torn. Ironically, many dermatologist-recommended “hypoallergenic” products made everything worse. For years, allergy specialists had no explanation for why my body reacted violently to products designed for sensitive skin.
Today, this pattern is attributed to Mast Cell Activation Syndrome—a condition where immune cells overreact to chemical, physical, or environmental triggers (Afrin et al., 2017). At the time, it was simply labeled “unusual sensitivity.”
What was clear, even then, was this: topical exposure was triggering systemic response.
Headaches. Respiratory distress. Inflammation. All from products that were never supposed to go past the surface of the skin.
A Childhood Lesson in Absorption
My introduction to transdermal healing came long before I knew the term.
In 1977, I suffered severe facial burns. In the emergency room, doctors warned my parents that permanent scarring was likely. As a young girl, that prognosis was devastating.
My father, who had recently embraced nutrition and alternative health, took a different approach. Every night for months, he applied warm chamomile tea bags to my skin, followed by vitamin E.
The burns healed completely. No scars.
Today, we understand that chamomile contains anti-inflammatory flavonoids and sesquiterpenes, while vitamin E supports membrane repair and oxidative stress reduction (McKay & Blumberg, 2006). At the time, we just knew it worked.
That experience rewired my relationship with authority. “It can’t be done” stopped being an endpoint and became a hypothesis.
The Skincare Industrial Complex
If skin is a biological interface, then formulation is a signaling problem—and mass-market skincare is optimized for a very different signal.
Large-scale personal care products are designed to survive heat, oxygen, shipping delays, and years of storage. They must remain stable across climates, distribution chains, and consumer misuse. That constraint shapes everything that follows.
Preservatives are essential to cosmetic safety. Without them, products become microbial hazards. But when preservation becomes the primary design goal, biological nuance often disappears.
High preservative loads, redundant systems, and aggressive stabilizers can alter the skin microbiome—an ecosystem increasingly recognized as critical to barrier integrity, immune regulation, and inflammatory signaling (SanMiguel et al., 2015).
From a systems perspective, these products aren’t “bad.” They’re optimized for shelf survival, not biological dialogue.
That’s why many mass-market formulations are engineered for reliability and longevity—effective in form, though often biologically quiet.
For a biological interface as complex as skin, durability alone isn’t enough.
Natural, Clean, and Biological Reality
Skincare marketing loves binaries: natural vs. synthetic, clean vs. toxic. Biology doesn’t.
“Natural” refers to ingredient origin. “Clean” refers to toxicological screening and transparency. Both frameworks have value—and both fail when treated as absolutes.
Some natural substances are harsh or destabilizing. Some lab-derived ingredients are gentler, safer, and more compatible with skin physiology.
Castile soap is a good example. It is minimally processed and preservative-free, yet its high pH can disrupt the acid mantle, damage hair cuticles, and alter scalp microbiota (Lambers et al., 2006). A well-formulated clean shampoo—though further removed from raw plant material—is often far healthier for both skin and nervous system.
Effective formulation requires biological literacy, not ideology.
Essential Oils: Chemistry, Not Mysticism
My approach to essential oils has always been grounded in chemistry rather than belief. Years spent studying molecular weights, constituent behavior, transdermal absorption pathways, and safety data shaped how I understand what the skin can—and cannot—absorb. That body of research later informed The Unspoken Truth About Essential Oils: Lessons Learned, Wisdom Gained, but more importantly, it continues to guide how I formulate, teach, and think about skincare as a therapeutic system rather than a cosmetic one.
What became clear over the years is that essential oils are not vague energetic tools. They are collections of low-molecular-weight chemical compounds capable of penetrating the skin and interacting with biological systems.
Most essential oil constituents fall well below the 500 Dalton threshold commonly associated with skin penetration limits. Blood and breath analyses show detectable essential oil components within 20–60 minutes of topical application (Jäger et al., 1992).
Whether those interactions are helpful or harmful depends entirely on dose, formulation, and context. Essential oils are not inherently benign—but they are one of the clearest examples of how topical chemistry becomes systemic communication.
CBD and the Endocannabinoid System
The skin is not just a passive barrier—it is neurologically and biochemically active. Cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2) are distributed throughout the skin, including within sebaceous glands, immune cells, and hair follicles (Tóth et al., 2011). This means the skin participates directly in the endocannabinoid system (ECS), a regulatory network responsible for maintaining homeostasis across mood, sleep, pain perception, immune activity, stress response, and inflammation (Lu & Mackie, 2016).
Understanding CBD as a topical ingredient requires viewing it through this systems-based lens. While researching A Little Handbook about Topical CBD: A Revolutionary Ingredient for the Skincare World, I examined how CBD behaves when applied to the skin—how it interacts with local receptor sites, how transdermal delivery differs from oral ingestion, and why localized signaling matters. These distinctions are often lost when CBD is discussed solely as a dietary supplement rather than as a bioactive topical compound.
When applied to the skin, CBD does not need to circulate systemically to be effective. Instead, it can act locally by:
- Interacting with CB1 and CB2 receptors in the skin
- Binding to TRPV1 receptors involved in pain, heat, and itch perception
- Modulating immune-driven skin responses associated with conditions like eczema, psoriasis, and inflammatory acne
Because transdermal delivery bypasses first-pass liver metabolism, topical CBD can exert targeted effects at the site of application without digestive degradation. This localized interaction helps explain why CBD topicals are often experienced differently—and sometimes more rapidly—than ingestible forms.
Neuroprotection Beyond the Skin
While researching A Little Handbook about Addiction: and the Future of Recovery That Could Include Cannabis, I encountered some of the most compelling evidence for topical CBD’s neuroprotective potential.
Several studies examining alcohol-related neurodegeneration and relapse did not rely on oral or inhaled cannabinoids—they used transdermal CBD. In animal models, topical CBD reduced anxiety, impulsivity, and relapse behavior associated with alcohol dependence (Viudez-Martínez et al., 2018).
What stood out most was the durability of the effect. Even after topical CBD was discontinued and no longer detectable in the system, behavioral and neurological improvements persisted for months.
That kind of sustained change suggests modulation of underlying systems—not temporary symptom suppression.
Magnesium and Barrier Intelligence
Magnesium deficiency is widespread and often poorly tolerated orally.
Research from the University of Queensland demonstrated that magnesium can be absorbed through the skin, improving hydration and increasing filaggrin expression—a protein critical to barrier function (Zhang et al., 2017).
Low filaggrin levels are associated with eczema, asthma, allergies, and impaired immune defense. By improving barrier integrity, topical magnesium may influence both localized skin health and broader immune resilience.
Magnesium appears to enter through hair follicles and sweat glands, offering a delivery route that bypasses digestive limitations.
Absorbing Wellness, Intentionally
The skin comprises roughly 10% of total body mass, but its influence extends far beyond surface area. It is metabolically active, neurologically connected, and constantly communicating with the immune, endocrine, and nervous systems.
Every topical product introduces chemical signals into that network—whether intentionally or not.
Some formulations merely sit on the surface, offering temporary cosmetic effects. Others interact with receptors, influence inflammation, support barrier function, or disrupt microbiome. Molecular size, solubility, carrier systems, and formulation strategy determine whether an ingredient evaporates, occludes, irritates, nourishes, or communicates.
This is why delivery matters as much as the ingredient itself.
Essential oils work because their molecular structures allow them to cross the skin barrier and participate in systemic signaling. Magnesium works because it accesses the body through follicles and improves barrier proteins critical to immune defense. CBD works because the skin contains the same regulatory receptors responsible for balance throughout the body. None of these effects are accidental—they are the result of chemistry meeting biology at the point of contact.
Skincare is not just about hydration, anti-aging, or aesthetics. It is a daily interface between your body and your environment, one of the few places where you repeatedly influence physiology without digestion, prescription, or intervention.
What you apply to your skin does not merely stay there.
And in many cases, wellness does not begin with what you swallow—it begins with what you absorb.
References
Tóth, B. I., Oláh, A., Szöllősi, A. G., & Bíró, T. (2011).
“Endocannabinoid signaling as a regulator of skin homeostasis.”
Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 131(2), 385–395.
— Demonstrates the presence and role of CB1 and CB2 receptors in the skin, including sebaceous glands and hair follicles.
Lu, H. C., & Mackie, K. (2016).
“An introduction to the endogenous cannabinoid system.”
Biological Psychiatry, 79(7), 516–525.
— Explains the role of the endocannabinoid system in maintaining homeostasis across mood, pain, immune response, stress, and inflammation.
Palmieri, B., Laurino, C., & Vadalà, M. (2019).
“A therapeutic effect of cbd-enriched ointment in inflammatory skin diseases and cutaneous scars.”
Clinical Therapeutics, 41(1), 85–94.
— Supports the anti-inflammatory and barrier-supportive effects of topical CBD in skin conditions.
Hammell, D. C., et al. (2016).
“Transdermal cannabidiol reduces inflammation and pain-related behaviours in a rat model of arthritis.”
European Journal of Pain, 20(6), 936–948.
— Demonstrates localized anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects of transdermal CBD without systemic psychoactivity.
Fox, L. T., Gerber, M., du Plessis, J., & Hamman, J. H. (2011).
“Transdermal drug delivery enhancement by compounds of natural origin.”
Molecules, 16(12), 10507–10540.
— Discusses how essential oil constituents enhance skin permeability and absorption.
Buchbauer, G., Jirovetz, L., Jäger, W., Plank, C., & Dietrich, H. (1992).
“Fragrance compounds and essential oils with sedative effects upon inhalation.”
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 81(6), 660–664.
— Demonstrates systemic detection of essential oil constituents after topical and inhalation exposure.
Moghaddam, A., et al. (2019).
“Evidence of transdermal magnesium absorption.”
Journal of Integrative Medicine, 17(1), 36–41.
— Supports magnesium absorption through the skin and improvements in hydration and barrier-related proteins.
Elias, P. M. (2005).
“Stratum corneum defensive functions: An integrated view.”
Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 125(2), 183–200.
— Explains the skin barrier’s role in immunity, signaling, and disease prevention.
Bos, J. D., & Meinardi, M. M. (2000).
“The 500 Dalton rule for the skin penetration of chemical compounds.”
Experimental Dermatology, 9(3), 165–169.
— Foundational work explaining why small-molecule compounds (such as essential oil constituents) can penetrate the skin.
